So many lawsuits to track... so much time and so much money wasted.
http://www.thecollegefix.com/
http://www.thefire.org/chicago-states-attempt-stop-stand-speech-lawsuit-fails/
https://www.techdirt.com/blog/?company=chicago+state+univerity
‘CIVILITY’ CONSTITUTES A THREAT TO PROFS’ BLOGGING AGAINST
SCHOOL, JUDGE SAYS
by GREG PIPER - ASSISTANT EDITOR on JANUARY 16, 2015
FIX FEATURE
Before Marquette University punished the outspoken conservative
professor John McAdams for blogging, Chicago
State University
was embroiled in a similar fight with two of its blogging faculty.
A federal judge ruled this week that those professors can
continue their First Amendment lawsuit against the administration for allegedly
chilling their speech, using an expansive reading of the school’s trademark
rights among other policies.
The case is part of the Foundation for Individual Rights in
Education’s Stand Up for Speech project, and the second this month to get a
judge’s blessing to move forward. The ruling last week at Iowa State University also involved disputed
trademarks.
Professors Phillip Beverly and Robert Bionaz contribute to a
blog that’s frequently critical of the CSU administration, CSU Faculty Voice.
Though the blog isn’t hosted on university servers, the professors claim that
the school has tried to shut it down.
CSU’s policies on cyberbullying and computer usage are broad
enough to chill the professors’ expression, they said, and the school said the
blog’s use of CSU’s name and trademarks “caused confusion” and “implied CSU’s
endorsement” of its commentary.
‘Civility’ as a threat to take legal action
Judge Joan Gottschall focused on a cease-and-desist letter
the administration sent to Beverly , specifically
its reference to “civility” – a watchword that has gripped faculty around the
country since the University
of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign revoked a job offer to anti-Israel academic Steven Salaita.
CSU General Counsel Patrick Cage told Beverly the blog’s “lack of civility and
professionalism” violates university policies. The professors “stress that this
letter is dated one business day after” a blog post accused the school’s
interim provost of having “partially falsified her resume,” Gottschall said.
Though the administration says the “civility” reference
wasn’t a legal threat to use the cyberbullying or computer-usage policies
against the professors, “[i]t is eminently reasonable to read the letter as a
demand to shut down” the blog for its “alleged failure to meet CSU on-line
civility standards,” Gottschall said.
Both policies have civility overtones, the judge said: One
prohibits “any communication which tends to embarrass or humiliate any member
of the community” and the other “could be read as prohibiting a series of
negative blog posts.” Gottschall noted neither policy explicitly limits itself
to material hosted on the university’s servers.
The professors have clearly stated “their First Amendment
rights were chilled” because of CSU’s language against their blog, Gottschall
said, denying the school’s claim that their fears were “speculative.” She said
the professors raised the school’s trademark theories only for “context” about
their First Amendment claims.
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education said the
professors’ next goal is to get a preliminary injunction against the school, so
it can’t enforce the cyberbullying or computer-usage policies or send any more
cease-and-desist letters about the blog.
Gottschall has referred the case to a magistrate judge to
consider that injunction “while the litigation is ongoing and to explore
settlement options,” according to the foundation.
Greg Piper is an assistant editor at The College Fix.
(@GregPiper)
No comments:
Post a Comment