But Watson has not only been propped up by his buddy Anthony
Young and a complicit Board of Trustees. They have been aided by the
complacency of administrators and faculty who buried their heads in the sand as
Watson meted out affront after affront to faculty roles in hiring, curriculum,
and the accepted practices of university administration. Where was the concern
when it became clear after Watson’s year I that administrative positions would
be permanent interims, that good people would be replaced in a revolving door
of jobs for FOW [friends of Wayne ]
with 6-figure salaries—all across campus? Watson and his crony team were given
a wide berth by many on campus who privately criticized but would not stick
their necks out publicly. You heard the murmuring across campus from
maintenance workers, to secretaries to administrative assistants who feared to
speak out, feared retaliation. Why did “we” who have the privilege of tenure
fail to come forward?
Failure is more than statistical.
Now EVERYONE on campus is jumping up and down in department
meetings and college meetings about what "we" can do to solve the
enrollment crisis. Where have you been for the past 3, 4, 5 years? How did “we”
let it get to this point in the first place?
I think I had my answer at my college’s most recent “all
college” meeting.
Since everyone knows (rather, hopes) Watson is out of power perhaps as early
as January, there was from my hearing a rather smug tone to the view expressed
and applauded that administrations at CSU come and go but we faculty have only to
endure them for 5-7 years. They will be gone, we will remain, so just keep doing
all the good things we do...
There it was: complacency and disengagement from university governance.
The words
at that meeting reminded me of the line Edwardian mothers supposedly gave to
fearful virginal daughters on the eve of their wedding night: just “lie back
and think of England .”
Pretty much sums it up at CSU.
No comments:
Post a Comment